Monsanto Roundup weed killer lawsuits are the biggest mass tort in the country. Lawyers everywhere are looking for potential victims. Our law firm is no exception. Stunning verdicts and talk of a settlement in excess of $10 billion have poured even more gasoline on the fire. What are these weed killer cases about and what can we expect moving forward?
Before we start that, there is something you need to know. If you have a Roundup herbicide non-Hodgin’s lymphoma cancer case, call a Roundup cancer lawsuit attorney. Not today. Right now.
New March 4, 2020 Roundup Update
I really think these cases are likely to at least begin settling in the next few weeks. Four trials as coming up in the next month. In California state court, Caballero v. Monsanto, is in the middle of jury selection. This was set to begin on January 27h.
In St. Louis, Monsanto’s hometown, a jury was also being selected at the same time in Wade v. Monsanto. This would be the first case to go to trial outside of the San Francisco area. So, in theory, we could have had two jury verdicts in the next month. But I think the Roundup cases will reach a global settlement in the next two weeks. And I think, as I explore more below, that that settlement will leave the German pharmaceutical company naked on future Roundup lawsuits. (March 2020 update: Oh, boy. Here we go again. The trial judge in St. Louis is delaying the trying to give the four plaintiffs in Wade the chance to further discuss settlement. Jury selection was still moving forward in California but then that trial got delayed.)
Now, with these trials pushed back, Bayer is talking tough again in March 2020, pumped up by support from the EPA and others in the Trump administration. After all that has happened, is Bayer going to let another case go to trial? There is a number out there that will not make this defendant happy. But it will keep that company going. I can’t imagine they are crazy enough to roll the dice. But I think we will know soon. You have heard that before? Maybe. But I suspect the road and the rubber will be meeting.
The Crux of the Roundup Litigation
A key ingredient in Roundup, glyphosate, has been associated with several cancers, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Our law firm is no taking multiple myeloma lawsuit, unfortunately. (Could this change? It could.)
This concern has caused public outrage by consumers who have been using Roundup for years or even decades. Monsanto vigorously found the possibility that Roundup causes cancer. After Bayer purchased Monsanto, Bayer grabbed the torch of defending the safety of the produce.
Undeterred, lawyers filed thousands of lawsuits from victims who claim Roundup failed to warn of the possible risks with glyphosate and that the chemical ultimately caused their cancer.
In 2016, after cases began to pile up against the company, a federal judiciary panel created a Roundup MDL, which is a “sort of” class action of all the Roundup cases in federal court. This had the great benefit of allowing plaintiffs’ attorneys to work together to develop the facts and the science behind the glyphosate claims.
The first Roundup verdict came in August 2018 when jurors awarded a plaintiff with terminal cancer $289 million in damages to a groundskeeper exposed glyphosate weed killer. The jury found that Roundup was a substantial factor in Dewayne Johnson’s non-Hodgin lymphoma. Importantly, $250 million of that award was punitive damages. What does that tell you? It tells you that jury was angry.
That amount stunned everyone. Me included. Immediately, Bayer’s stock plummeted as the company began truly digesting, maybe for the first time, what the litigation exposure they had in these cases.
In February 2019, the first federal court case from the Roundup MDL went to trial and ordered Monsanto to pay out $80 million dollars. Only 3 months later, in May 2019, Monsanto was hit once again when jurors awarded a plaintiff with a staggering $2 billion dollars. Sure, some of these verdicts have been reduced. But the jurors are sending a loud message.
Monsanto’s Downward Spiral
The credibility of Monsanto’s “Glyphosate is perfectly safe” mantra has been deteriorating since the early 2000s when scientific research began to be conducted on the safety of glyphosate. In 2003, the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine published an article focusing on a study of 3,400 farmworkers in the Midwest. Their results showed that higher rates of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma are associated with glyphosate exposure.
That initial study appeared to slip under the radar. But it wasn’t long until new research began to further expose the company. In 2014, the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health released an article where they concluded the active ingredient in pesticides, including glyphosate, had “strong associations” with B cell lymphomas. By 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, a division of the World Health Organization (WHO), found that glyphosate is “probable carcinogen” and caused cancer in animals and human cell DNA.
Despite all these publications, Monsanto has been sticking to its claim that Roundup is safe to use. In face of the backlash, Monsanto brought out Dr. Donna Farmer to respond to the media. Dr. Farmer has 20 years of experience studying chemicals at Monsanto. She disagrees to this day with researchers’ scientific studies showing Roundup’s cancer risk and denies there ever being conclusive data to support that herbicide is a carcinogen. According to her, WHO has been cherry-picking and misinterpreting data used in their studies.
I don’t know that I think Dr. Farmer is a liar. I think she has drank too much weed killer Kool-Aid. I mean, who do you believe, the WHO or Dr. Farmer? The real issue in the legal context: what do jurors believe? Well, jurors are making their opinions loud and clear with the incredible verdicts they have awarded to victims.
- New April 2020 Bayer settlement of false Roundup ads
The FDA Defense
One defense Monsanto is using is the fact that the FDA has not pushed back against them. This is a classic drugmaker/medical device manufacturer tactic that Monsanto has predictably jumped aboard in defending these cases. The FDA has credibility with most Americans.
In March 2017, documents were released that showed Monsanto had a suspiciously close relationship with the FDA and EPA. The documents suggested that Jess Rowland, a former deputy director of the Environmental Protection Agency’s pesticide program, was willing to get rid of an FDA study that focused on the association between Roundup and cancer. When this detail came to light, Rowland quickly retired. Again, draw your own conclusions. (The EPA, by the way, continues to stand behind the Roundup weed killer. Why does the EPA draw the opposite conclusion from the data as the IARC? The EPA relies on unpublished studies put out by industry. The IARC relies on peer-reviewed literature.)
What Happens Next?
Currently, the manufacturer of Roundup, pharmaceutical giant Bayer, is seeking to settle the cases against them in hopes that they can put this experience behind them and return to usual business. Whether this will work out for them, however, is still unclear. Bayer reportedly offered $8 billion to settle 18,000 pending cases, but the plaintiff’s committee of attorneys seeks $10 billion. But, like asbestos and other cases where the harm is not immediate with exposure, the cases will not stop. Additionally, the public outcry against Roundup is only getting stronger. Many won’t be satisfied until Roundup is taken off the market for good.
Here is the other issue that could blow up this settlement that Bloomberg wrote about recently. Bayer wants this litigation over yesterday. But, like I just said, there will be more cancer claims from this pesticide. Someone said the other day — and I don’t know if it is true — that 70% of the glyphosate that has been used in human history has been used in the last 10 years. Think about that. If the latency period is 10-15 years, how many more glyphosate-related claims are out there?
Bayer wants a settlement agreement that deprives people who have not even gotten cancer yet from their right to bring a claim down the road. That will not happen and it could be a problem. Still, I personally don’t think Bayer will hold up the settlement for anything. They know this litigation is a threat to their very existence. If that means swallowing and dealing with a smaller amount of claims down the road, I think the bite that bullet. But we could find out soon, hopefully in March 2020.
If My Case Settles, When Would I Get My Money?
Here is the bad news most people do not fully understand. The settlement of mass tort cases is a time-consuming process. When you would get your settlement money is unknown. But if I had to guess, I would say sometimes in 2021.
If You Have a Claim, Please Call a Lawyer NOW!
There are potential statute of limitations issues with many claims filed at this point moving forward. This does not mean you don’t have a claim. But I’m imploring you, if you or a family member may want to bring a claim for compensatory damages, call a lawyer today. You can reach me at 800-553-8082 or you can get a free consultation online.