Michigan Lawyers Weekly published an article titled “Populist juries side with plaintiffs.” (No web link available.)
This title got my attention because I have been speculating about the impact our economic troubles are having on jury verdicts. The thesis of the article appears to be that juries are more likely to side with plaintiffs in this economy, but are less likely to give large damage verdicts. Although, it quotes one lawyer saying he got a larger verdict than he asked for, which he attributed to the economy.
Unfortunately, the article is just anecdotes from plaintiffs’ personal injury lawyers who have recently received good verdicts. This is not exactly the target audience for a fair look at the issue. The lack of hard evidence is not the fault of Michigan Lawyers Weekly. The economy really turned in October with the meltdown in the financial markets, and there is just not a lot of data since then that has been collected and analyzed.
The Colorado Springs Business Journal says that at least one study indicates that jury awards have declined 40% and personal injury verdicts are down 50%. But the article does not cite the time referenced in the study. It does not even tell us what the study is. In other words, it is completely useless to us.
The Michigan Lawyers Weekly article did discuss another phenomenon that I’m certain is true: clients are pressured by the difficult economy to settle cases (and seek settlement loans). It appears to me that the amount of the pressure is actually inversely related to the size of the case. Personal injury victims with larger claims seem to me to feel less pressure from the economy to settle because their goal is not to get enough money to get back on track, but rather, their goal is to seek an amount of money that will have a larger impact on their lives. But in smaller personal injury cases – mostly car accidents in our practice – clients seem a bit quicker to pull the trigger on settlement.