COVID-19 Notice: We are providing FREE consultations via phone or video conferencing for your safety and convenience. Learn More »

Settlement Value of Knee Injuries

Knee injuries make up probably 10% of our law firm’s car accident caseload. This is consistent with studies that show how often knee injuries occur in car accidents.

What is the settlement value of a knee injury case? Below we discuss the average and median settlement values of these cases. We also list more statistics, relevant medical literature, and the importance of expert testimony.

Our law firm has successfully handled scores of serious knee injury cases. Most recently, we won a $5.2 million verdict in a knee injury case. We fight for our clients. Call (800) 553-8082 or get a free online consultation.

What Is the Average and Median Knee Injury Settlement?

According to a Jury Verdict Research study on knee injuries:

  • The average verdict in a severe knee injury case is $359,149
  • The median knee injury verdict is $114,299
  • 8% of knee injury verdicts were over $1,000,000

There are several factors to consider when looking at these numbers. First, JVR defines “severe” as knee dislocation, fractures, replacements, and aggravation of a preexisting knee injury. Aggravation of a preexisting knee injury is subjective and harder to define, possibly bringing the average verdict down.

Secondly, half of the cases in the study were car accident lawsuits and the other half were all other lawsuits. In Maryland, by contrast, around 75% of knee injury cases are from car accidents. We have fewer premises liability cases due to our contributory negligence law.

JVR does not provide the average accident knee injury verdict in motor vehicle collision cases. However, the median is probably more illustrative. The median knee injury verdict in a car accident case is $94,406. Interestingly, the middle 50%—the 25th to the 75th percentile—ranges from $26,255-$216,726. That is a large range, and the bottom quartile is likely made up of minor injury cases.

The last knee injury case we took to trial led to a $5.2 million verdict. It was a severe injury case in which the client required a below-the-knee amputation.

What Do Knee Injury Verdict Statistics Tell Us?

Below are more knee injury verdict statistics:

  • Intersection collision accidents have a median of $70,748. The middle 50% range is $28,250-$237,500.
  • Pedestrian accidents have a median of $150,000. The middle 50% range is $80,071-$240,000.
  • Turning collision car accidents have a median of $90,203. The middle 50% range is $34,750-$192,038.
  • Motorcycle collisions have a median verdict of $191,884. The middle 50% range is $83,300-$287,500.
  • Rear-end collisions have a median verdict of $9,095. The middle 50% range is $1,624-$41,098.

The range for rear-end collisions is so low because there are just very many knee injuries in those types of accidents. Many knee injury claims from rear-end accidents are based on preexisting injuries, which are the toughest cases to bring. Additionally, there are few serious “knee injuries only” injuries in rear-end car accidents. If you hurt your knee badly in a rear-end accident, chances are you have additional injuries that are also serious.

Motorcycle accidents often involve the most serious knee injuries. However, it is amazing how many motorcycle accident lawsuits involve contested liability. For whatever reason, juries don’t like motorcyclists. This is unfair, but good counsel can overcome the challenge.

Remember that worker’s compensation cases have an entirely different, lower output formula to calculate the value of knee injuries that happen on the job.

knee injury verdicts

Does Good Expert Testimony Help Settlement Value?

The treatment and prognosis of knee injuries have evolved as much as any other traumatic injury over the last 10 years. There is a greater understanding of the knee’s mechanics. New technologies allow doctors to better diagnose, treat, and understand the long-term consequences of knee injuries.

These improvements have consequences in the legal sphere. A medical expert’s explanation of the function of the knee joint and the effect the injury will have on the patient is a critical component in how much a jury will award if the case goes to trial.

The expert—an unbiased treating doctor, in a perfect world—needs to take the jury through the x-rays, CAT scans, MRI studies, and the arthroscopic examination of the surfaces of the involved bones.

This is significantly easier in knee fracture or dislocation cases. Instead, many serious knee injuries are soft tissue injuries involving one or more of the non-bone structures of the knee. In car accidents, these injuries often occur when trauma to the thigh or shin bone is accompanied by an opposite force directed against the foot, resulting in torque that is violently transmitted to the knee.

You need a qualified expert to explain why a soft tissue knee injury can be serious — a heart attack is also a soft tissue injury — and how it is an injury that can haunt a patient for the rest of their lives.

It is critical that the expert articulates all the long-term effects. The defense expert will have some song and dance about how degenerative changes like arthritis would have occurred even without the crash because of the normal aging process. Our experts need to confront these defenses head-on before they gain currency with the jury. In most cases, science, and medical records are on our side.

knee injury verdicts

What Key Medical Studies That Come Up in Litigation?

These are some leading articles from the medical literature discussing traumatic knee injuries that experts sometimes rely upon (directly or indirection) in knee injury litigation:

  • Sheth U, et al. Early surgery of multi-ligament knee injuries may yield better results than delayed surgery: a systematic review. J ISAKOS, 2019, 4(1):26-32. A study of 260 patients found that for multi-ligament knee injuries, better results were seen in patients who got surgery more quickly.
  • Everhart JS, et al. Return to work or sport after multi-ligament knee injury: a systematic review of 21 studies and 524 patients. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(5):1708-1716. This study deals with an issue our clients often face, i.e. trying to go back to work after surgery. This study underscores the challenges for patients trying to get back to work or to play sports
  • LaPrade, RF, et al. The Prevalence of Abnormal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Knees. Am J Sports Med, 1994, 22:739-745. This is an article defense lawyers used to pin meniscus tears on a prior event. This study found that even among people under the age of 40 who have no history of a knee injury, six percent show a meniscus tear on an MRI. They often point to this 2008 study as well that provides the statistics for people aged 50-90 (19% to 56%).
  • Atkinson T, et al. Knee injuries in motor vehicle collisions: A study of the National Accident Sampling System database for the years 1979–1995. Accid Anal Prev., 2000, 32:779–786. This oft-cited study underscores a fact that defense lawyers like to ignore: that the lion’s share of serious knee injury cases are not from crashes that occur at extremely high speeds.

How Can I Get a Great Lawyer for My Knee Injury?

If you need a car accident lawyer in Maryland —one who understands the science of the knee—to get you the money damages you deserve, call Miller & Zois at (800) 553-8082, or get a free, no-obligation case evaluation online.

 

Contact Information