The Maryland Daily Record reports on a Carroll County electrician who was recently awarded $2.3 million in a medical malpractice case by a Baltimore City jury. After a week-long trial, the jury found the defendant doctor negligence for piercing the plaintiff’s spinal cord during a pain relief procedure.
Doctors have utilized therapeutic steroid injections for years. The standard of care requires that any injectable substance that a physician puts into a patient is safe, sterile, and prepared to accepted industry standards. The standard of care also requires the doctor to know where the needle is going in the patients, which should be far removed from the spinal cord itself.
I am assuming what happened is the injection went into an artery supplying the spinal cord. The arterial supply to the spinal cord travels adjacent to the nerve root. So if you get it wrong, there is a possibility that an intra-arterial injection could result in a permanent injury. But I’m not sure, the article is a little short on details. It is also possible that the cord needle penetrated the cord, which just should not happen.
The plaintiff, an electrician, now has a right arm which has atrophied and suffers from numbness and pain in his legs. He originally went to the defendant doctor after suffering a herniated disc injury.
At trial, two other physicians testified who spoke with the defendant who admitted that his needle hit the spinal cord during the procedure. Also introduced into evidence was a medical record which stated that the needle might have hit the spinal cord. The needle should not be near the dura or the spinal cord.
Which really makes you wonder why in the world this case ever went to trial. One thing I know for sure. In every Carroll County mediation I have had in a medical malpractice case, the mediator felt compelled to lecture on the risks of trying a malpractice case in Carroll County. There is no question this is not a top 5 Maryland jurisdiction to try a personal injury or medical malpractice cases. But there is also no question that Carroll County is changing and so are its jurors. Both changes are for the better. (Actually, wait. This is a Carroll County plaintiff who filed in Baltimore City. So none of that is relevant to this case. I’m leaving it in because the analysis might be important to someone with a case in Carroll County.)
Other Pain Relief Injection Malpractice Lawsuits
The standard of care when performing epidural steroid injections is to first determine whether they are medically necessary. Often the malpractice in these cases is that the doctor never should have been prescribing steroid injections in the first place. The risk is greatest for injections into the patient’s neck.
Another concern with cervical injections is picking the right thickness for the need to avoid complications. That could have been an issue in this case too. A thick needle is more likely to penetrate the dural or spinal cord.
Risks Associated with Herniated Disc
Jumping off subject for just a second, the risk of this type of malpractice is very real to every single patient who needs steroid injections for a herniated disc. This procedure requires placing a needle in the patient’s back and injecting a steroid right over the neural structures that are inflamed or irritated. It involves some sort of conscious sedation or anesthesia and x-ray guidance to place the needle right over the nerve at issue.
The risks of injury and the difficulty of the procedure is a thing that defense lawyers like to “blah, blah, blah” but it is a really important thing to bring out through your client and the doctor who performed the injections at trial because it really is a big deal.
What “Top Doctor” Means?
The defendant doctor was named a “Top Doctor” by Baltimore Magazine in 2005.
As I have written before in the context of ranking doctors and lawyers, while these rankings can sometimes be helpful to some people in some circumstances, the designation of “Top Doctor” is usually done by polling other doctors, who are presumably friends, colleagues, and acquaintances of the doctors in question and not necessarily in the best position to make the call. That is not to say that these doctors are not great physicians because most doctors voted “Top Doctor” probably are.
So such an award or recognition is of probative value in choosing a doctor. But too many people trying to make a quality decision as to the doctor or lawyer that is best for them stop at such a lofty designation when it is really only the beginning in considering the person who is best for you and your needs.