The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that plaintiff’s attorney Marc Bern filed a lawsuit against Random House in U.S. District Court in Manhattan alleging that his clients purchased James Frey’s now famous “A Million Little Pieces.” Plaintiff’s attorney stated that the claim was based on “failed to conduct a reasonable investigation or inquiry regarding the truthfulness or accuracy” of the material. Bern said he will seek a mere $50 million in damages, presumably for the “pain and suffering” of reading a book that they thought was non-fiction.
Why Am I Writing About This on a Personal Injury Blog?
My feeling is that this claim is worth about fifty cents on its best day and lawsuits like these do personal injury victims and their attorneys a disservice. They feed into a popular anger over lawsuits, leading people to believe that recoveries of this kind for this type of “tort” are commonplace when, of course, they are not. Stores of million dollar recoveries in cases that simply never happened fuel this frustration. My favorite is the man who, assuming his Winnebago would drive itself, set the cruise control at 90 mph, left his seat and went to make a cup of coffee, and then sued and recovered millions because he was not warned that cruise control did not mean the vehicle would drive itself. Of course, the other great “myth” is the McDonald’s coffee case, which has been so distorted that the actual facts of the case have been long lost. For the real facts of that case, click here. You will note that the car accident happened over 20 years ago now, the plaintiff is now dead, and the court cut back her jury award anyway.
The point is that our team at Miller & Zois fighting every day to recover fair compensation for our clients. To do this, directly or indirectly, we have to ask jurors for financial compensation for a victim’s injuries. It is (near) impossible to accomplish this task if a jury does not believe not only in the client but in his or her lawyer. Lawyers asking for $50 million in damages because his “clients” read a book they thought was non-fiction, does not help personal injury lawyer’s credibility with a jury.
A good thing that Maryland did after this post was change the rule so that lawyers are not permitted to ask for a high damage amount in the Complaint. Why? For the very reason we are battling here. The idea that someone should get millions of dollars for reading a book that was filled with lies is the same as someone who has lost their family because someone got drunk and crossed the double yellow line and got them killed.
What Is the Solution?
Besides changing the law like Maryland has already done, there really is no solution. Celebrity lawsuits and anomalous verdicts are always going to define plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ lawyers and jurors are going to come in with preconceptions about us. Our job is to overcome them.
Let’s close this with a quote from our friend James Frey taken from “A Million Little Pieces.”
“Live and let live, do not judge, take life as it comes and deal with it and everything will be okay.”
I guess it was not all fiction.