ESPN is running a story about an NFL player who was arrested last night for public intoxication. I think if public intoxication was a regularly enforced crime, we would need to start building more jails.
But I was interested in something the player reportedly said to police: “I know I am drunk, but does that mean I cannot walk home?”
I think the first reaction to this report is that we are all glad that he made the choice to walk and not get behind the wheel. But walking while drunk is one of the great unmentioned public health problems in this country. According to the journal Injury Prevention, almost 60 percent of fatally injured pedestrians were legally drunk.
In SuperFreakonomics, the authors argue that walking while drunk may actually be deadlier than driving drunk. On a per-mile basis, a drunk walker is eight times more likely to get killed than a drunk driver, and walking drunk leads to five times as many deaths per mile as driving drunk. (Of course, walkers are covering a few less miles than drivers.)
We care less about drunk walkers than drunk drivers, relatively speaking, for an obvious reason: they put us at less risk than drunk drivers do. But drunk walkers do cause serious auto accidents that often result in chain reaction colissions that lead to injuries and deaths beyond that of the pedestrian. Moreover, people behaving stupidly matter, too.