Nearly a quarter of a million Americans undergo total hip replacement surgery. All of them do so reluctantly. This invasive orthopedic surgery is a major operation. Everyone agrees that there are unavoidable risks involved in the procedure. These risks include a foot drop (also called peroneal nerve palsy or drop foot), sciatic nerve injuries, and, many believe, RSD even when the surgery is performed properly.
There is no doubt that the fact that it is a known complication of hip replacement surgery does not make for an easy malpractice case no matter how egregious the facts are. I’m telling you that the surgeon could do the operation with a machete while wearing a Groucho Marx mask and any Maryland insurance company would still mount a defense. But that does not answer the question posed which is whether it can be medical malpractice when a patient has a foot drop after a total hip replacement.
Let’s start with the consent form. It is not game, set, match that it is a known risk and that the patient signed a consent form. We have kept consent forms out of evidence at trial because that is not the real question. It is a known risk that walking though some neighborhoods in East Baltimore after dark is dangerous. But it is still a crime when I get mugged, right? The same goes here.
Can a Foot Drop After Hip Replacement Stem from a Doctor’s Mistake
There is no question that a doctor can depart from the standard of care and improperly performed a total hip replacement. How? Lots of ways. The unnecessary application of excessive force, pressure, and compression upon the soft tissues surrounding the sciatic nerve, or improperly placed or weighted retractors during surgery are all possible explanations of how a foot drop would occur.
In many of these cases, the doctor just says, “I have no clue what happened” to the patient. But if there are no complicating factors at least some doctors will tell you that the only major risks to the sciatic nerve are excessive force and pressure and compression upon the soft tissue surrounding the nerve during the retraction required in the procedure or the incorrect placement or weighing of retractors. It does not require wild malpractice to do this. Everyone agrees that even a partial instrumentation injury to the sciatic nerve will cause a foot drop. So a small mistake could cause a patient a lifelong injury.
So I don’t think there is any question that in many cases, injury to the sciatic nerve that causes a peroneal nerve injury is the result of a medical mistake by the surgeon in applying excessive traction or pressure while trying to get to a joint during the procedure. Really, I think in the abstract, any defense expert would agree with this premise. The question is what happened in the particular case at issue.
Does Our Law Firm Take These Foot Drop Total Hip Replacement Cases?
Our law firm has never handled one of these case and probably never well. I buried the lede, right?
Why? I just wrote that negligence causes these injuries. The malpractice world is cruel. Almost every malpractice case we have is a challenge. There is almost always a defense. We have four solid cases in suit right now where liability is not seriously contested. Every other case we have is vigorously contested. Malpractice claims do not start at midfield. The doctor goes in with the presumption of having provided appropriate care. So we have to have a better chance then pick-em to go to trial. The deck has to be stacked in my client’s favor to have a viable claim. We know that surgical mishaps are a major cause of foot drop injuries during hip replacement surgery. I’m convinced of that. Proving that fact in a specific case is an entirely different issue. Too many of these cases end in a loss at trial.
You could fill the largest stadium in the United States with cases that come from medical malpractice in this country each year where the victim was killed. Yet only a fraction of those people bring successful claims. There are many, many more injury claims where negligence is the cause of the injury but no claim is ever brought. There are some cases I’m sure where the negligence is so over-the-top that our firm would take the case. But the vast majority of these cases where malpractice occurred are of the “this is more probably than not malpractice but I not 90% certain” variety. That is not enough to bring a claim, regrettably.