Published on:

New School Bus Camera Law in Maryland

schoolbusThe Maryland General Assembly 2011 session is over. The amount of great bills passed that will really serve the citizens of Maryland was just incredible. (I know, I know… perhaps I exaggerate a bit. The alcohol tax was a good idea, it just should have been higher.) There one bill passed that I support and I think is interesting. Local municipalities may now use cameras to catch motorists speeding past stopped school buses. Violators will get a ticket with a penalty of up to a $250 fine, but no points on their driving records. Montgomery County has had cameras in place  for a while but they were just giving out warning tickets. This bill has some teeth, albeit little baby teeth without any points attached.

This bill was precipitated in part by a Maryland State Department of Education study that found that thousands of drivers in the state are passing school buses with their stop arms extended and their red lights flashing. A total of 7,028 violations were recorded on a single day last month. Nearly 4,000 (3,997) of those motorists were oncoming drivers who ignored the stop arm, 2,665 drivers moved past a stopped bus on the bus driver’s side of the vehicle, and 366 drivers passed a stopped bus on the door side, right where you would expect a child to be walking. Baltimore County drivers are the worst offenders, followed by Montgomery County, Baltimore City, Anne Arundel and Prince George’s.

(Now keep in mind, all of this data comes from school bus drivers who, as a breed, think we are all idiots and don’t belong on the road. So let’s say they are exaggerating by a factor of 10. It is still a staggering number.)

Maryland Transportation Code § 21-706 (2014)

This is the Maryland law in 2014 with respect to passing school buses that are flashing red lights.

Vehicles required to stop upon meeting or overtaking school vehicle operating flashing red lights:
(a) If a school vehicle has stopped on a roadway and is operating the alternately flashing red lights specified in § 22-228 of this article, the driver of any other vehicle meeting or overtaking the school vehicle shall stop at least 20 feet from the rear of the school vehicle, if approaching the school vehicle from its rear, or at least 20 feet from the front of the school vehicle, if approaching the school vehicle from its front.

Vehicles allowed to proceed when lights deactivated or motion of school vehicle resumed:

(b) If a school vehicle has stopped on a roadway and is operating the alternately flashing red lights specified in § 22-228 of this article, the driver of any other vehicle meeting or overtaking the school vehicle may not proceed until the school vehicle resumes motion or the alternately flashing red lights are deactivated.
Vehicles on divided highways
(c) This section does not apply to the driver of a vehicle on a divided highway, if the school vehicle is on a different roadway.

Maryland Transportation Code § 21-706 has not been addressed by Maryland appellate courts in nearly 60 years There have been two Maryland cases interpreting this law.  In Chackness v. Board of Education of Harford County, 120 A.2d 392 (1956),  a guy driving a Cadillac convertible passed a bus and hit a child on Route 1 in Bel Air.   Awful.  I have a black and white image of the whole thing in my head.  Anyway, this Caddy driver tries to bring in the bus driver (who Google tells me died in 2010 and has a son who is a lawyer) and a 14 year-old school bus safety, claiming they were also negligent.  The argument?  The ole “sudden stop” claim.   The court dismissed the claim pretty easily.  The bus driver was defended by William B. Somerville of Smith Somerville & Case fame.

The second case, Jubb v. Ford, 157 A.2d 422 (1960), is an odd case involving a “sort of” school bus that was not large enough to be a school bus and did not have flashing red lights.  The court found that it did not seat 10 or more kids because no evidence that its carrying capacity was greater than eight and that it would violate the law if the vehicle did use red flashing lights.  This case also had Smith, Somerville & Case defending the case and Judge Frank Cicone representing the plaintiff.  These old cases feel like a who’s who of Maryland legal history.


Maryland legislators who dislike speed cameras were put into a bit of a pickle with this bill. Some detest speed cameras on deeply held anti-Big Brother values. These legislators either decided the principle of protecting kids was paramount or that the politics of protecting kids necessitated a ‘yes’ vote. Either way, the bill passed the Maryland Senate 38-7 and the House of Delegates 124-14.

Posted in: Auto Accidents
Published on:
Updated: