Medtronics Lead Recall Lawyers File Class Action Lawsuit
Plaintiffs in the Medtronic defibrillator litigation are seeking class action certification against Medtronic for their defective implantable defibrillators. Five deaths have already been attributed to broken wires in the leads of these Medtronic defibrillators. Regrettably, more are expected given that 235,000 Americans have the four Sprint Fidelis lead wires that even Medtronic concedes are failing. Medtronic estimates that four to five thousand patients with the Sprint Fidelis lead will experience a lead fracture within 30 months of implantation. (You cannot help but assume this is low.) Medtronic is asking the 235,000 people with these defective electrical leads to have their physician evaluate whether their lead has developed a fracture. Certainly, you should contact your doctor if you do not know whether you have a Medtronic defibrillator - many people do not know the brand of their defibrillator, much less details as to the component parts (although most patients have a wallet card that will specify the manufacturer of their defibrillator leads). The Sprint Fidelis leads that have been recalled have the model numbers 6949, 6948, 6931 and 6930.
Obviously, lead recalls are particularly serious given the difficulty to replace them. Should a defective Medtronic defibrillator be replaced if there is no evidence of a fracture? This is an issue that can and should be addressed with your doctor.
While Medtronic has not disclosed the precise mechanism of how these Sprint Fidelis lead fracture failures have failed, it appears that the defect is caused by the small diameter of the coil and conductors in the lead. Because of this, the lead is subject to stress damage both during and after the defibrillator is implanted. A lead fracture occurs when the conductor is critically overstressed. While only five deaths have been reported, many people are reporting repeated electrical shocks due to their lead having fractured.
Medtronic appears to be trying to do the right thing after the damage has been done. Medtronic deserves credit for this. But the problem with Medtronic and these other medical device companies selling defibrillators is that because defibrillators are so lucrative, in an effort to sell more product than the competition, companies rush out new defibrillators, supposedly technologically superior to older defibrillators, but with no proven history of safety and reliability.
Our lawyers are representing patients with these Medtronic defibrillators with defective leads not only in Maryland but around the country. Fill out this brief form if you need additional information or would like us to review you case, or call us at 800-553-8082.
You can also click here for a question and answer of the issues in the defibrillator lead recall class action.
Comments
I'd like the ICD removed and the leads capped. Anyone know a doctor that would take an objective look at that idea?
Posted by: JJG | April 11, 2008 7:28 PM
Have I read that lawsuits are prohibited because the FDA had approved the device?? Mine failed too.
Posted by: Don Hannon | August 25, 2008 1:59 PM
My mother got a severe shock that was verified by the medtronic representative. She is 84yo. They had to remove the ICD and replace it with a pacemaker.It was very unsettling to her. This incident occurred in the last year. Is she a person who would (could) be included in this action?
Posted by: Stephen Stefani M.D. | December 27, 2008 8:13 PM
My husband have one of the defective ones and died in march- 13 -09 with no answers of what wen wrong i hope someone dous somenthing about this money wound bring him back:(
Posted by: silvia sargent | April 30, 2009 12:55 PM
My 15 yr old son has a bad lead. He has to go to hospital every 3mos instead of 6 mos, because of the bad lead;therefore we have more doctor bills. Does anyone know if we can get reimburse for the extra travel and office visits. If he didn't have a recall we would not have to go back so often. He has been shocked 9 times. He had an ICD storm and was shocked 8 times in 19 mins. He did need every shock and I'm very thankful for his ICD. They also seem to think that they will fracture in children more easily....does anyone know...
Posted by: anita | June 16, 2009 9:05 PM