Lawsuit Filed Against Lawyer Rating Website Avvo

A class action lawsuit was filed last week in Seattle, Washington against an internet lawyer rating service named avvo.com. The lawsuit claims that the service provides a misleading and inaccurate assessment of lawyers’ abilities, and is in violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act. According to the lawsuit, the website gave two Supreme Court justices the same rating as an attorney who was convicted for conspiracy to defraud the government.

According to the lawsuit, a Bellevue, Washington lawyer listed an award with Avvo he won last year for playing softball, which caused his rating to rise. Obviously, this award is unrelated to the lawyer’s ability to practice law.

I have mixed feelings on Avvo, which has yet to begin rating Maryland lawyers. On one hand, I think many consumers, particularly unsophisticated consumers, need some assistance to make their decisions. These consumers need particular protection from lawyers who pretend to be personal injury lawyers but have never come close to trying a personal injury case before a jury. The problem is, however, that it is impossible to conjure up an objective formula to rate lawyers. This difficulty was clearly underscored by the lawyer whose rating increased by his ability on the softball field.

Posted in:
Updated:
  • shelia

    I agree, Avvo ratings are inacurate and work in favor of bad lawyers. I hired a lawyer [name withheld] in MD, based on her high rating given by Avvo. She was terrible and lacked any initiative in handling the case. I fired her prior to the case going forward. I wrote a comment in Avvo, needless to say my comment was not posted but, her rating went up.

Contact Information